bikefix Exclusive Review: Injinji Performance Tetrasoks

Because we can. I imagine that this simple statement goes a long way toward answering the resounding "why?" that comes when people see these Injinji foot gloves. Erm, toe socks. Injinji compare standard socks to "foot mittens" claiming that they reduce toe dexterity, increase heat and moisture buildup and skin-on-skin friction (all of which are considered Bad Things). So, with the goal of combating these evils, the company has taken advantage of modern knitting technology to build a technical version of the novelty socks that swept the country's junior high schools several years back.

The Performance Terasoks I've been using on and off for almost a year were a gift for someone who knows about my love of all things weird and different. I've worn them casually, for running, for hiking and while riding and have to admit- I think that they're cool. Not because of any real performance benefit, but mostly because of how they look padding around the house without shoes on. Because we're a bike site, though, I'll focus on how they work on the bike.

Because most riding shoes at this point are pretty darn stiff, the Injinji's don't really allow the rider to make much use of their toe dexterity (though I imagine monkeys would love them). While it can take a while (for socks) to pull them on and get the toes in the right spots, they have a nice cozy feel. Inside snug cycling shoes, though, the extra 8 fabric thicknesses can be a bit much, though my Shimanos have enough space in the toe box that things don't get uncomfortable. Contrary to Injinji's claims and despite a fabric that is 70% Coolmax, I feel that the Tetrasok's actually run a bit warmer than normal cycling socks. I have the feeling that this might be the result of having less volume available for air circulation and while it's good to pull moisture from between the toes, it really doesn't have anywhere to go from there. For warm rides with lots of stream crossings, though, they can be nice, without the heat of a full-on wool sock. They're certainly a bit thin for winter use, though. One big advantage, from my perspective, is the complete lack of any toe seams, which can be annoying in any sock (Sock Guy's seem to bug me the most)- if you're particularly irritable in that respect, they might be worth seeking out.

Regardless of their claimed technical merits or my comments above, I bet that most folks will have decided if they would want a pair after seeing the first photo. Me, I think that they're neat and different. They're neither at the top or the bottom of the sock drawer and do see regular use. After probably 20 wearings and washings, they're in fine shape, with no unexpected wear, despite their complexity. They're available at REI (among other places) for $12, which seems to be the going rate for cycling socks these days.

marc

www.injinji.com

btw: “Injinji“ is pronounced (In-gin-ji) and is an African term which describes when a drumming circle reaches a climax, the peak in the performance, when all of the participants are at one with the rhythm, when everyone hits a stride and there is unison among all. Quasi-science meets quasi-spiritualism. Somehow, I still like 'em.

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Initial Review: Fox Unabomber gloves

About a month ago, I posted an initial review of Fox's carbon fiber-knuckled Bomber gloves. To rehash, they were cool (looking) but hot (feeling) and I felt that I should probably sell them and buy something a bit more desert-appropriate. Thanks to eBay, I was able to send the Bombers on their way to Israel, where some MX kid is no doubt enjoying them right now. To replace them, I had the local bike shop order a pair of the company's lighter Unabombers.

Where the Bombers are really a motocross glove, the Unabombers are a pared-down bike-specific version. Like their big brothers, they have carbon fiber on the knuckles and top couple of finger segments- but here only for the outer two fingers. Rather than large expanses of perforated leather(ette), the Unabombers have far more fabric and large mesh sections on the palm. There is also a woven Kevlar patch at the outside of the palm, apparently a high-wear area. The color scheme is a subdued black/gray, which suits me well. A terry thumb is a nice touch for the sweaty (and snotty) among us and the printed grippy bombs on the first two fingertips make them extra grippy, even when wet.

The Unabombers certainly feel more like cycling gloves than the Bombers. Dexterity and bar feel is slightly better to boot. In use, they are cooler than the Bombers, though not by as much as I would have hoped. The effectivity of the mesh palm is reduced by the grip that usually covers the area and the gray fabric at the back of the hand is actually really warm- it doesn't seem to move moisture well and it's not uncommon for me to look down and see it soaked with sweat (and that's not a particularly sweaty area). Most annoying, though, is the carbon knuckle placement. On most rides so far, the glove seems to be slipping such that the knuckle guard slides down to cover the first finger segment rather than the knuckle. It's not a big deal to readjust (even while riding) but annoying nonetheless. Also, the loosely woven Kevlar palm patch seems to be loosening already (after three weeks), which is a bit worrying this early in the game. Aside from these annoyances, the gloves are generally comfortable- not particularly well padded, but with decent grips, they provide good bar feel and comfort.

I'll carry on using the Unabombers on & off through the summer and well into the fall and let you know what happens. I'm a bit worried about the Kevlar bit, the fabric at the back could be improved and the knuckle placement needs tweaking, but I have a feeling that (with a generation or two of development) these could be a winner. If you can't wait that long, you can find them in shops and online for $43 or so.

marc

www.foxracing.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: Swiftwick Four Ole socks

Following our review of their awesome NaturWool 2Sox last fall, Swiftwick was kind enough to send us some of their socks to try. Marc gave me a pair of the company's Ole Four socks to try. We received them while it was still fairly chilly out and they looked like summer socks, so I put-off testing them until the weather warmed a bit.

I like natural fibers a lot, but I also recognize that man-made materials can be quite excellent too. These socks are an example of that. They are made of 80% Nylon, 15% Olefin [a fiber that absorbs .01% of its weight in water, has won a Nobel Prize and happens to float], and 5% Lycra. They are quite thin overall but have strategically placed thicker areas. They have a number of nice touches like a tighter-than-normal cuff to keep them in place, an almost imperceptible toe seam, and the sock size is knitted into the foot-bed. Best of all, they are also made in the USA baby.

They are very comfortable, but fit quite tightly and at first I was concerned by the tightness, but once riding it was forgotten (and it might even help reduce foot swelling on long rides). After a number of long hot rides I have decided that these socks rock. This sock does what its name implies- wicks moisture away from your skin. I was amazed at how cool and happy my feet were (and its been hot here). The highest praise I can give them is that they felt like they became part of my body. I had to keep looking down to make sure they were still on.

This is absolutely a summer sock, and I would hesitate to use it on epic-length ride at high altitudes because it would offer little warmth if the weather got cold and wet. That is my only caveat in recommending these socks. If cold (though not winter) weather is a possibility, Swiftwick also has a wool blend sock which we like very much too. The Ole is available in three different cuff heights. The company is also geared towards custom socks- these would make some of the nicest we've come across. You can view the range on the company’s website at www.swiftwick.com.

charlie

www.swiftwick.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: Castelli "Castelli" jersey

What's just about as good as being fast? Looking fast! I ordered Castelli's "Castelli" jersey this spring because it reminded me of the colors used on Gulf's Porsche race cars from the '60s and '70s (light blue and orange), only reversed. Can't get much faster than that. Of course, coming from Castelli, I expected that the construction would be high quality, the fit a bit slim, and the details pretty well thought out.

Sharing the same cut as several other Castelli Jerseys, the "Castelli" has a 3/4-length zipper. The three rear pockets are pretty standard, but in one sits a nice soft inner iPod or cell phone pocket with a buttonhole (to the inside of the jersey) for a headphone cable. It's a bit small for a wide-ish Motorola Razr, but fits skinnier phones and iPod Nanos very well. While I tend to discourage the use of headphones while road riding, there's no better way to get a good workout in a short period of time than listening to some good music while single speeding, and the player stays put very nicely while riding. Three reflective dots on the leftmost rear pocket are a nice touch if the ride runs unexpectedly long (but no substitute for proper lights come nighttime). The fabric itself is very thin- almost papery and very lightweight.

My jersey was one of the first '08s to come through and felt a bit baggy around the waist. Castelli had a problem with the "gather" on some of their early deliveries, but it's since been addressed. The looser waist may suit baggy short fans, though, so go through your shop's inventory to find one that works for you. Though I ordered expecting Castelli's fit to be a bit snug, it wasn't as snug as I expected. I usually wear a medium, and the Castelli large fits my 145lb frame OK (though not road snug). If you're over, say 175lb, an XL may be in order. Looking at the photos, I'm thinking that a medium would probably be more flattering to my (ahem) aerodynamic biceps- without being too short. As always, try to support your local shop and make use of their fitting room if possible. While the fabric isn't nearly as airy feeling as I expected, it does a very good job at moving moisture away from the body- great under the kind of big pack that big summer rides require. While there are cooler jerseys out there, I find that more open fabrics can be too cool for early morning starts and find that a long zipper makes up most of the difference once the day warms. I've also worn far warmer ss jerseys, so would have to put this one somewhere in the middle of things.

In this case, $80 gets you a very cool looking (in my opinion), American-made jersey with a hidden pocket that makes it perfect for music lovers. The colors are visible in traffic without screaming commuter!- a plus in my book. It wicks moisture very well, and while it isn't as cool as some of the more mesh-y jerseys I've worn, it's all the more versatile for it. I've been wearing it nonstop since I got it.

marc

www.castelli-us.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: Castelli Lowboy sock

Mmm... Socks. Every cyclist I know has loads. Warm socks, cool socks, comfy socks and awful socks. Still, we find it hard to resist just one more pair. As temperatures have climbed into the 90s here, my warm wooly and trendy tall socks have made their way to the bottom of the sock basket. At the top? Cool socks.

The coolest of them all, I happen to think, are these Castelli Lowboy socks. Cool not only for their antibacterial Meryl fabric and their fancy Italian logos, but also for their in-the-shoe fit. The cooling gained by exposing my pasty white ankles to the summer air is hard to quantify but certainly noticeable- and much appreciated. The cut is just tall enough keep my cycling shoes from rubbing on my exposed ankles- but not one bit taller. From a few feet away, they're all but invisible.

The pictures here were taken sitting on the patio after a recent 60mi, 90° road ride. During this and other long rides, the Lowboys have done a good job at removing moisture from the foot itself, and the white band around the forefoot feels supportive (though my heat-moldable insoles are arguably doing much more of the work). On the mountain bike, they seem to be a bit too low- the low cuff seems to take in sand and dirt as soon as I start walking- they're really a road-only kind of thing. At $13, their price is on par with other cycling socks'. They're not cute or witty, but on a hot summer day, there's nothing else that I'd feel cooler wearing.

marc

www.castelli-us.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: Fox Flux helmet

The Flux seems to be Fox’s answer to the popular Giro Xen helmet. Like the Xen, it has more protection than a standard XC helmet, a sloped “urban” style back, and models with “tough” looking graphics. These helmets are aimed directly at the "all-mountain" and "trail" bike markets. Since all helmets in the USA are certified by the same test, we don’t really know how much more protective helmets with thicker EPS foam are, but these helmets also tend to have a deeper rear profile- and most certainly offer more protection in the lower head/neck region than a standard XC or road helmets. They also tend to be heavier than typical XC helmets. The Fox is no exception at 390g, which is slightly beefier than a Giro Xen.

The Flux only comes in 2 sizes (a bit annoying): either small/medium or large/extra large. For my big round head, I ordered the latter. The first thing I noticed was it wasn’t as comfortable as either my Xen or my Uvex XP 100. I think it is the shape of the interior of the helmet more than the retention system. The Flux is not uncomfortable but has some pressure points that can be annoying. I have tried different size pads to help remedy this but I can’t get it to feel better. It may just be my head shape. Of course, everybody's head is a bit different and the straps were easy to adjust.

The retention system looks very similar to the Giro and it works reasonably well too. It is a bit more stubborn to adjust than the Giro system, but on the other hand it doesn’t seem to loosen over time like the Giro's can. Despite some serious use and rough handling, none of the plastic retention parts have broken. That is cool because this has been a problem with some helmet brands in the past.

The Flux comes with both a visor and a spoiler (see stock photo below). They are both removable and I immediately took off the “spoiler” because it looks dumb and I can’t believe there could possibly be a reason for it other than (questionable) aesthetics.

Although the helmet has 20 vents, it seems hotter than any of my other helmets. That may be because of the dark “urban camo” color scheme (not my first choice)-, but almost all the color choices available are darkish. The Fox Flux is a pretty good helmet and I would like it a lot more if it fit me better. Try it on and if it fits you well- put it on your list of contenders. It retails for $99.95.

Charlie

www.foxhead.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Initial Review: Fox Bomber gloves

Bad Ass. After my trusty Fox Digits finally bit the dust, I set out for the local shop looking to replace them. There, these shiny black, carbon fiber-knuckled Fox Bomber gloves were just too cool to resist. They have the well-evolved Fox fit that seems to work well for many people and appeared pretty reasonably priced at $40.

It turns out that the Bombers are classified by Fox as a Motocross glove. As such, there are very few concessions to light weight or breathability. On the trail, they certainly feel protective, but get pretty warm pretty darn quick. The cuffs come further up the outside of the wrist than I'm used to, but its not a bad feeling- just different. The carbon fiber knuckle protection is a bit uncomfortable at first, but the padding underneath broke in within a couple of rides and they're now hardly more noticeable than other gloves' knuckles. Despite the numerous seams on these pretty complex little guys, I haven't felt any chafing at all on 3-6 hour rides.

Its early yet, but I've been impressed by the Bombers so far. For more gravity-oriented riders, the added protection will be appreciated and the extra warmth more than acceptable. For those who are looking for something a bit more cycling-specific, the company's Unabomber model has similar carbon fiber knuckle protection for the ring and pinkie fingers, a terry thumb and lighter index and middle fingers.

The lack of a terry thumb is a shame, and now that temperatures are closing in on the 90s here, they're being left home in favor of lighter (though less protective) gloves. At this point, they'll probably be out of service until September or October, which is a shame. I'm considering seeing if anyone on eBay wanted them and ordering up some of the three-season Unabombers. If you suffer from cold hands or tend to hit the ground a lot, though, the Bombers are comfortable, protective and most of all pretty freakin' badass- which is why most folks will buy them in the first place.

marc

www.foxracing.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: Shimano SH-M225 shoes

Shoes are hard. They're a complicated product that sees a huge amount of abuse, especially on the mountain bike. They have to fit and support the second strangest part of the human body (the foot) while transmitting massive amounts of weight and power through a cleat not much larger than a quarter. They have to be stiff enough to ride in all day while comfortable enough to walk in when you've broken a stem or used your last tube. The lugs have to be grippy, durable and shed mud without interfering with the pedal or weighing anything. They should be adjustable while riding and well ventilated but protect the foot from rocks, stumps and cacti. They should probably look good and be reasonably priced, too.

Almost three years ago, I picked up this rather flashy pair of Shimano SH-M225. Well, they were flashy at the time, but after 140 weeks of 4-6 rides per week they're looking rather broken in. I was attracted to the stiff (but light) carbon fiber sole plate, the easily-operated ratchet and (of course) the fit. Compared to other mid-range ($150-225) shoes I tried on, they seemed like a great value at $180. Two (carbon fiber-look) Velcro straps snug the forefoot and a wide, slightly padded strap is secured with an easy to grasp ratchet (shared with several other Shimano models). While I have my suspicions about just how much carbon fiber extends beyond the cleat window, the rest of the sole is made of a hard, stiff plastic, over which is co-molded a softer translucent tread material. The perimeter of the shoes is made of a tough rubberized textile and there is a very stiff (and somewhat deep) molded heel cup at the rear. There is a fair amount of mesh over the forefoot and between the straps, but there are certainly better-ventilated shoes out there.

I have normal-width size 9 1/2 feet, but they're oddly small in cross section. As a result, I have trouble finding a shoe that can fit well over the top of my foot. Most companies' ratchets bottom out before becoming snug. Sensing my frustration, Shimano saw fit to provide threaded inserts in two positions for mounting the ratchet itself to the shoe. The upper would probably work well for both folks and the lower works well for me and some women I've noticed wearing these.

While (at about 800g for the pair) these aren't the lightest shoes around, I have to think that the M225s are some of the sturdiest. I use these shoes off road for epics and single speed racing, for my daily commute and for 50+ mile road rides, all with Crank Brothers Eggbeater pedals. All together, I have between 7,500 and 10,000 miles in these shoes and have very few complaints. The shape of the shoes happens to work well for me. While I couldn't compare them to a glove, the deep heel cup and secure straps do a good job of holding my feet in place without hot spots. The shoes do tend to loosen up after a couple of stream crossings, but that's why the ratchet is there- it's easy enough to reach down and snug them up without stopping, even off road. While waking on hard New Mexico sandstone has worn the front lugs down to the harder plastic inside, overall the treads are holding up very well. The rubberized textile and synthetic leather, while scuffed, has yet to be punctured and I couldn't find a seam that's come loose. Riding in New Mexico, where hard rock is far more common than mud, I haven't been using the hard toe studs but wouldn't mind another (grippy) lug under the toe for short scrambles but don't know that I've fallen for the lack of one.

Unfortunately, nothing is perfect and I do have a couple of complaints. First of all, I don't like the supplied Shimano insoles one bit. I had forgotten how bad they were until I wore out my inexpensive aftermarket insoles and threw them back in before a 50mi road ride. Within 10 miles my feet were tingly and within 20 they were numb. That hadn't happened in ages, even during two 24-hour races. I took them back out and the problem immediately went away. Secondly, I've managed to wear out the fabric and blow all of the stuffing out of the heel cup. It's not uncomfortable (yet), but the rest of the shoes probably have another year in them, and it's a shame for one aspect to be so much worse off than the rest of the shoe. Several years ago, I had a pair of shoes with leather (or synthetic leather) inside the heel cup. I never noticed them allowing my feet to move around and that would be my number one request for the next version of these shoes. Over the past few years, I've munched a couple of ratchets. Given the miles that these have seen and the fact that I'm using the lower mounting position, I'd have expected them to have died earlier, to be honest. Happily, they gave plenty of warning and are shared between several Shimano models. Any bike shop worthy of the title should be able to order replacements for around $10. The stiffness of the sole means that the M225s are more riding than hiking oriented, so if your regular rides include a large amount of hike-a-bike, there may be better options. On the road, the soles (and pedal choice) will put some folks off, but they look Pro enough that folks may not even notice (until you win the post-ride sprint to the refreshments).

A quick note about pedal choice: Shimano are under no real obligation to make their shoes work with Crank Brothers' pedals, but I feel that these do. However, if you let your Eggbeater cleats go too long between replacements, they will wear and allow the pedals' bars to rub on the shoes themselves (something that Time's ATAC pedal bars are actually designed to do). This will wear little grooves into the shoe in front of and behind the cleat. So far, though, the carbon fiber seems to be taking it just fine (I've actually snapped other shoes' soles after wearing grooves into them with Times). Crank Brothers now make a $10 set of steel shoe protectors that sit between the cleat and shoe to prevent this, which I'll be reporting back on when I go to new shoes.

All in all, the SH-M225s are a great shoe. If they fit, I can't think of any reason not to recommend them. They're stiff, comfortable and pretty darn bombproof. The SH-M182s are very similar, but seem only to save about $20 and forego the carbon fiber shoe. The company does make a near-$300 heat-moldable shoe, but it's quite different and looks to be more race-oriented.

marc

bike.shimano.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Initial Review: Uvex Supersonic RS & GT helmet

Back in November, Charlie wrote favorably about the Uvex XP 100 helmet that he's been sporting for over a year now. After talking to the folks at Uvex's US distributor and in the market for a new helmet, I decided to give their Supersonic a go. In January, a very Pro looking white & red Supersonic RS arrived at my door and was immediately pressed into service. The German-made helmet seems very well built, with in-molded upper and lower shells, which serve to keep the helmet together in a crash as well to protect it during everyday handling. Rather than having a large number of vents (23 here), the Supersonic has a number of large vents, and I have little doubt that the total open area is on par with or greater than most others on the market. A dial-driven and height-adjustable retention system allows for easy adjustment and can accommodate a wide range of head sizes (52-58cm for my xsmall/medium) and is particularly nice in the winter when different thickness hats are needed for different temperature rides. A Uvex signature feature is their Bee Stop mesh, which prevents insects from getting sucked into (and getting angry in) the three large front vents. While it's useful, the mesh can interfere with some lights' helmet mounts, but can be easily (if permanently) removed with a pair of scissors. While the included (removable) visor isn't adjustable or color matched to the helmet, the straps are, which is a nice touch. Speaking of the straps, they feature a multi-position buckle which I never really take advantage of- but some folks may appreciate.

Compared with its predecessor (Giro's excellent but aging E2), the Supersonic is lighter by about 45g (or about an ounce and a half). In practice, though, it felt significantly lighter. I have a feeling that this is because it fits my head that much better than the Giro. Don't get me wrong- I love my E2s (the last was my 3rd) and never felt that they was moving around on my head. That said, the Supersonic is noticeable for its complete lack of movement. It may be because I'm at the upper end of the size range (usually wearing a Giro medium), but even with the retention system completely relaxed and the strap unclipped, I can put my head between my legs and shake it without the helmet coming off. This is pretty remarkable as it comes without any pressure points or headaches. Also noticeable for its absence is any interference between the retention system and my sunglasses. While not usually an issue with the E2 either, on longer rides, things sometimes shift and the pinching can cause nasty headaches (Giro have addressed this by creating eyewear with short, cycling specific arms). The dial-adjustable retention system is also far easier to tweak while riding and the adjustment has never changed unintentionally.

As far as complaints go, I only have one so far- and it's fairly minor. The pads on this $90 helmet seem a bit cheap and early-90s. The fleecy pad material, while very comfortable, doesn't seem to breathe as well as other brands', which wouldn't be a big deal if there weren't an uninterrupted foot-long pad running from ear to ear (see picture, right). This, I imagine, is in place to act as a sweatband, though its still too cool to know if it works well in that capacity. As a result, the helmet can feel a bit warm on low-speed off road climbs, and it hasn't yet topped 70 degrees here. It should be noted that I have almost no hair on my head, so I may be more sensitive to a helmet's warmth than hairier folks. On the road bike, though, at higher speeds, this hasn't been noticeable at all.

One of the most important things to look for in a helmet is fit. Over 1,000 on- and off-road miles in, the Supersonic fits me better than anything I've ever owned, which is fantastic. While there are a number of very good mid-range helmets out there, Uvex is one of the only brands sold in the US the majority of whose helmets are manufactured in the West (Germany), under the EU's strict environmental and labor regulations- an added benefit. The difference between the $90 Supersonic RS and $100 Supersonic GT is the finish: the GT has a more modern/urban/stealth rubbery matte finish, while the RS is shinier. Finally, for $120, the Black/Gold/Pearl Supersonic GT can be ordered with coordinated Crow Pro sunglasses (which sell on their own for $70)- a helluva deal. While I'm hoping not to have to test the Supersonic to its full capacity, I'll touch base in 6 months or so to let you know what I think then.

marc

www.uvexsports.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: Castelli Free short

Is this what it feels like to wear sexy underpants? Here's what I mean: When I wear Castelli's Free shorts, which are part of their top-flight Rosso Corsa range, I'm not thinking about them the whole ride, but when my thoughts turn south, they make me feel good- even sexy. It may be the new-for-2008 AC pad. It may be the fantastic cut, which is all but unnoticeable on the bike. It may be that the leg grippers are red (the sexiest color) inside. Whatever the reason, after a couple of months' use, these are far and away my favorite shorts- and they make me feel special whenever I wear them.

I've done a number of 30+ mile mountain bike and 50+ mile road rides in the Frees and really have no complaints. Even after several hours on the bike, the Free shorts are all but invisible. While the legs aren't quite as snug as those on Descente's Aero shorts, they are among the more supportive I've worn. The leg gripper band seems to be made of a slow-rebound fabric which takes a moment to find its place, but once it does, the internal leg grippers keep everything in place without pulling at unruly leg hair (man that stuff grows fast) or irritating freshly shaven skin. They also don't leave unsightly post-ride seam lines on your thighs. There are also scorpion-patterened grippers on the outside of the short, which I have a feeling are mainly for decoration, but help keep tights (or knee warmers, if you feel compelled to wear them on the outside) from moving around too. There is a reflective tab at the back of the leg, which isn't noticeable when riding but should hold up better than a screened-on reflective logo. According to Castelli, "to bear the Rossa Corsa logo, a product must represent a categorical breakthrough in technology." A multi-density 3-D, anti-microbial pad, the AC used here is unique not just for being very comfortable padding-wise, but also for what's being called ComforTemp technology- said to maintain a constant 98 degree temperature in use. The Free use several different fabrics, playing on the strengths each. A durable and seamless Action inner panel is used where wear is expected, compressive Energia compressive fabric is used on the sides to support the leg muscles and lightweight and breathable Breathe fabric keeps things cool in the front and on the upper back. Surprisingly, there are only seven panels total (plus the leg grippers), but the cut and choice of fabrics seem to more than makes up for the lack of seams.

While these are easily the nicest shorts I've ever worn, direct comparisons will be difficult. Retail for the Free shorts is a somewhat alarming $199. My personal cycling short experience had previously topped out at $130 or so, so these are in another realm altogether. The Free short and ($230) bibshort are Castelli's flagship product and the company has clearly spent quite a bit of time getting them right. I would attribute part of the price to the flailing US dollar, but these are hecho (very well, I should add) en Mexico. Landmark birthday coming up? Been training extra hard for that century and want to treat yourself? Given the times I've been disappointed by other companies' $100+ shorts, I probably could be tempted, though more easily by the Cronus (which use the same AC pad and the more durable Action fabric throughout). As is our schtick, I will keep riding in the Free's throughout the season and let you know how they're doing, particular after weekly washings and in 90+ degree temperatures. Will they still make me feel hot (in a good way) in August? Until then, though, there are far worse ways to spend $200. Bicycling's recent buyers' guide did suggest dropping money into shorts more than any other piece of clothing... Just keep it rubber side down.

marc

www.castelli-us.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: Fox Digit Glove (05?)

In mountain biking, Fox Racing and gloves are almost synonymous. While much of Fox's motorsports- and urban-inspired gear isn't to my personal liking, I've been using their gloves off and on since I really started riding in the early 1990s. After buying an over-featured glove whose rubber inserts made my fingers go numb, I opted for the simpler Digit as a replacement.

For the past several years, the Digit has been Fox's mid-range ($28) mountain glove. Following recent trends, the palms are almost unpadded, with only two layers of synthetic leather between your hands and the grips. The knuckles are lightly padded with a Neoprene-like material, and the dense mesh finger backs have rubber doodads stuck to them. A Velcro closure keeps them tight and they're available in a few different color combinations (which change from year to year).

I've been using this particular pair of gloves since probably early 2006. While they're a bit warmer than I'd like in 80 degree temperatures, they still work fine and keep on working fine down to about 50 degrees. While nominally mountain bike gloves, I wear them for cool weather commuting as well for a bit of extra road riding insulation (compared to fingerless road gloves) that doesn't become oppressive if the day warms. Several of the finger doodads have fallen off and there are broken seams in the palms and on one finger. The silicone index finger grippers are long gone and I've managed to pull a chunk out of one of the knuckles, too, but none of this seems to impact function. In fact, I've already purchased a replacement pair (expecting these to have given out months ago), but they just keep going. Over several years and hundreds of hours of riding, these gloves have hardly drawn attention to themselves, except with the occasional odor that whispers wash me. That's pretty impressive. They stay put and help protect my hands from sticks and rocks- just as they're meant to.

While I'm seeing more and more gloves last one year or less, with fraying palms and bursting seams, the Digits just keep on keepin' on. As much as there are times when I'd like a bit more padding or another glove catches my eye, it'll be hard to justify replacing these with anything else. While it's certainly possible to spend more on a riding glove, I'm having a hard time seeing what would be to gain... The '08 model looks to be very similar in intent (though without the doodads) and should be available pretty much everywhere.

marc

foxracing.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: Woolistic Cycling Shorts

This winter, I bought a bunch of wool clothing from various different manufacturers. I wanted to see which companies make clothing that I would be willing to buy again and/or recommend to my friends. When browsing the different websites I realized that the only pair of tight lycra-style shorts I found was made by Woolistic – a Swiss company who only designs wool cycling clothes (much of it vintage looking) [Ibex are another -marc]. Their clothes are made in different places from Europe to Asia, but they all are high quality and all use Merino wool.

To make these shorts work with the movement of your body, Woolistic used a well thought-out 6-pannel cut and just a bit of synthetic “stretch” (only 6%- 4% Nylon and 2% Elastic), the rest (94% - for the mathematically challenged) is lightweight merino wool. Despite the high wool content, they are machine washable. The chamois is specifically made for these shorts. It is made in one piece, with antibacterial Coolmax fabric and elastic padding so it can move with you – unlike most chamois. It varies in thickness from 2mm to 8mm ant the one-piece construction means it should last a long time.

I was a little skeptical about how these would feel while riding– I mean, even nice, high quality merino wool could be itchy when pressed against my inner thigh for hours on end, right? Not to worry though, as they don’t feel rough or scratchy at all. These shorts are very comfortable and are a fair bit warmer than my Lycra style shorts. On cold days these go very nicely underneath my tights.

These have quickly turned into some of my favorite shorts for riding, and even when the temperature starts to rise I will be wearing them. I bought an XL which might be a tad large for me – next fall I will buy a Large pair. My only complaint is that the bottom of the short (just above my knee) doesn’t lay tight against the skin now that they have been washed a few times. This could be because they are a size to big for me, or it may just be trait of these shorts. However, it doesn’t affect my riding- it just looks a little dopey.

These are some seriously fine shorts and have a special quality that is hard for synthetic shorts to replicate. Check them out at www.vintagevelos.com. $ 115.00.

charlie

www.woolistic.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: Louis Garneau Alveo short

Being of Quebecois descent, I really want to like Louis Garneau. With factories in Northeast Vermont and just over the boarder in Quebec (the part that looks like a cold Francophone Ohio), the company makes a huge range of cycling apparel, from kids' helmets to shoes pro-level tri gear. Unfortunately, much of it has had a slight oddness about it. Maybe it's Louis' irrational love of dog spot prints, but I've been scared of LG gear for a while. About 20 months ago, shopping for shorts, I heard good things about Garneau's high-end ($130) Alveo shorts and decided to give them a go. I'm glad that I did.

While there seems to be a fair amount of chamois-sharing among clothing companies, I've never seen any quite like Garneau's ErgoZone. As is common, the pad is a multi-thickness anti-microbial piece that runs from 10mm thick under the sit bones down to 3mm on the inside of the thighs. It is pre-contoured in a way that fits my body very well and makes it near impossible to photograph well (you really don't want to see my old chamois anyways). Most interestingly, it is perforated throughout, making it look a bit like an upholstered couch. The fabric of the short itself is stretchy and ripstop-looking (Garneau claim abraison resistance), ten panels of which are patched together very nicely with slightly contrasting charcoal flatlock seams. There is an odd little pocket on the top of the right leg that would be quite nice if it were big enough to hold a Gu packet, license or small phone. As it's not (Garneau claim that it's for money or keys), I only notice it long enough to wish it were a tad bigger and then forget it again.

A year and a half on, these are some of my favorite shorts. The cut is just fantastic. My size medium pair fit well and almost never require hitching up or the use of the included drawstring. The pad is comfortable for all-day rides and I never had any chafing, even on long road rides. Despite feeling a bit heavy, the fabric wicks well and the shorts weren't any warmer on hot days than any others. While I can't swear to it (it's been a long time since it was that hot) the perforated pad may have helped to prevent dampness down there, which is always appreciated. The cut is supportive- noticeably more so than Pearl Izumi's, but not restrictive, which should help to reduce leg fatigue.

After hundreds and hundreds of miles (if not hours) in the saddle, the only thing that is starting to wear a bit is the leg grippers, are starting to loose their exposed elastic. Heck, even the screened-on reflective logos are still doing their job admirably (see the photos). Looking closely now, the stitching that holds the pad in place has started to come undone, but there is still plenty of thread keeping it anchored for the time being. The legs could be a shade longer (maybe 1/4-1/2in), but I've owned far worse. Since buying these, I've made the mistake of getting adventurous with my short purchases and straying from what I know works well for me. Ultimately, though, if I had a shorts basket full of Alveos, I'd be more than happy. Fabrique au Canada.

For Summer 2008, there will be a $140 Alveo 2. I know it's just a name, but couldn't they have come up with a better name for their chamois fabric than "Crabyon?" In any case, it's a visibly different pad, so I can't speak to it's comfort, alleged ability to enhance "the body's immunity to disease" or "slow and steady release of chamois lotion" but am certainly curious...

marc

louisgarneau.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: SwiftWick NaturWool 2Sox

Why review riding socks? Its certainly not something I really saw us doing- everyone has so many, and they tend to be chosen as much for the logo as the sock itself. The other day, though, I realized that after about 16 or 18 months in service, these SwiftWick (formerly WickWear) wool socks almost never make it into the sock drawer. That's because, during the cooler 8 months of the year, they go directly from the drying rack onto my feet.

Regular readers might be forgiven for thinking that I'm not a big fan of wool. It can be fairly expensive, require particular care, and doesn't always perform as well as more modern fabric. For a cool- or wet-weather sock, though, wool is hard to beat. Over the years, I've owned and worn through a number of pair of wool cycling socks. Smartwool's seem to wear out more quickly than I'd like, Sock Guy's have an oddly placed seam that irritates my little toe, and DeFeet's Woolie Boolies are nice, durable and dense but not particularly cozy. That said, I still prefer wool socks from fall through spring thanks to their insulating (even when wet/damp), wicking, and comfort.

I came across these rather fetching Ibis-branded socks the fall before last. To be honest, it was the cool color (I bought a light blue pair first) and reversible cuff that did it for me initially. It turns out, though, that they were really, really comfortable. The 60%/30%/10% merino wool/nylon/Lycra blend is very soft (not at all scratchy), and the fairly complex knit is cushiony on the bottom and heel and dense over the top of the foot (helping to prevent hot spots) and just right around my bony cyclist's ankles. The toe seam is apparently burried somewhere in the fluff, but it's hidden so well that I can't feel it with my toes, even in snug riding shoes. The flip-able cuff that drew me to the socks in the first place is the only disappointment. Flipping them down doesn't really provide for more cooling- rather than a long-ish (3in) but wicking layer, you get a shorter (1.5in) double-layer. As neat an idea as it is, I never really bother.

18 months on, the Ibis Mojo is long gone, but the socks are still being ridden. Not only are the American made SwiftWicks my favorite cool-weather riding socks, but I've been using them for hiking as well and (save for some furriness around the logos) they look like new. That's got to be about 50 wear/wash cycles for each of 2 pair, which doesn't sound like much but is pretty impressive when you consider that many folks' favorite riding shorts may only see 20 or 30 rides per year. The company goes into additional detail about the construction on their website, and the socks are available for custom order, with a 60pc minimum. I'm not sure who other than MBA and Ibis are selling their socks, but they're certainly worth seeking out.

www.swiftwick.com

marc

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: Louis Garneau Toe Covers

Covered in vents, modern riding shoes do a great job of letting cool air in and hot air out- exactly what you want when working hard in warmer weather. Unfortunately, once things cool down, these vents don't stop doing their job, and cold toes often result. For temperatures in the 40s, toe covers do a good job of keeping cold air out and warm air in, without the need for a full shoe cover, which can be hot, sweaty, and look plain silly with knickers.

Many toe covers are just that- little cones of windproof fabric that occasionally secure over a road cleat. Québécois Louis Garneau has come up with (or borrowed) a much nicer solution. Essentially a toe bra, Garneau's Toe Covers actually circle the entire shoe. Made of the company's stretchy Stopzone fabric, they are windproof and water resistant (though your feet are still going to get wet) and allow easy access to many shoes' top strap and/or ratchet, for easy on-bike fit adjustments. There is a mildly sturdier material over and under the toe, which sees much more abuse than the rest of the covers. Consisting of less fabric than a handkerchief, they stow easily in a jersey pocket if the day warms, though I can't remember them ever causing my feet to overheat.

At $20 retail, I can't really complain about these covers- in fact they do an excellent job and work on both mountain and road shoes. Minimize any off-the-bike time, and they'll last a reasonable amount of time. Take them off road, though, and they're done for. Used seasonally for commuting, mine have lasted on the order of 18 months. Taken off road, they're done for in two rides- I learned the hard way, and without excessive hike-a-bikes. I would happily pay another $5.00 and deal with the extra bulk if Garneau could find a sturdier fabric for the toe area- maybe the Kevlar-reinforced material they use on some of their gloves would be more appropriate. That way, I wouldn't feel bad throwing them on for cool rides off road as well as on.

louisgarneau.com

marc

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: Craft Windstopper Thermal Tight

[It doesn't take much to make Charlie curse, but it sure takes a lot to make him want to cry. Seeing as he's usually wearing pants when I see him, I really don't think that his problems stem from technique. Our apologies for using a stock photo- we couldn't get him back into these to take one of our own. -marc]

I thought I would try the Craft WS Thermal Tight when I saw it this winter because I like so many Craft products. The Craft tight looks nice when it is on the rack and it feels good when you are wearing it, however, the part in-between is where it fails miserably. It is so hard to get these tights on it will drive you crazy. It took me more than 8 minutes once. This is not a fit issue either. Craft decided to put a Gore Wind Stopper layer inside front of a semi-tight (loose fitting tight) but didn’t tie the layers together. The inner liner just bunches up down below the knee when you try to put it on, making it unbelievably difficult to get your foot through, even after understanding the nature of the problem. It helps a little to take your sock off before trying to slide your foot through, but not much.

To top things off, when I was struggling to get them on one day, the ankle zipper separated and it took me quite a bit of time and effort to get it working again (although not perfectly)

When riding they are very warm and stayed warm even after sweating profusely. I plan to keep these as a back-up pair only and hope I never have to struggle to put them on again.

I hope Craft fixes this design for next year, because I like most of their products. They retail for about $150.00. Don’t buy them.

charlie

craft-usa.com

More...

Collapse Post...

Adidas Cycling becomes Mavic

The choice of the Adidas name for Adidas-Solomon's range of cycling clothing and footwear has long struck us as odd. We thought that cycling, an outdoor sport, would have fit better with Salomon's other lines (Nordic & Alpine skiing, hiking, trail running). The Adidas name certainly didn't help the line's perception, either, despite the well thought-out product. Well, for spring/summer 2009, the Adidas Cycling name will be no longer. The line will now be sold under the Mavic (also part of Adidas-Solomon, and designers of the Adidas Cycling line) name. We wouldn't be surprised to see more of it in shops going forward. As long as everything isn't covered in ugly yellow ovals...

bicycleretailer.com
bikeEU.com

More...

Collapse Post...

bikefix Exclusive Review: Descente Shelter Tight

I bought these tights as an impulse on a cold day at my local bike shop – anticipating some very cold riding that week. Although the rest of that week wasn’t that cold, I am glad I did buy them because I use them quite often.

The Shelter tights are made with a windproof/ waterproof material that covers all of the front legs from ankle to waist. The backside of the tight is made from standard Lycra with fleece lining. They have no chamois of their own - which makes them much more versatile (which I prefer). I typically wear them with a padded Lycra short underneath.

Anyone who has ridden in cycle clothes with “wind-block” type materials can tell you: they can get sweaty underneath real quick, especially if the temperature goes up, or the ride is harder than anticipated. The Shelter tights are no different in this respect. The Descente’s seem to wick moisture well for a “wind-block” type material but its hard to tell– my legs just aren’t that sensitive you know.

They were comfortable in the dressing room and also on the trail. I also like that they stay in place and don’t bunch-up behind the knee like some tights can. I have a 34/35ish waist and a 30in. inseam- I bought a Large and it fits very well, but has enough length for longer legs than mine. It should be comfortable for someone with a larger waist too- maybe up to a 37. Toughness doesn’t seem to be an issue as they have lasted through many miles of mountain and road rides now.